(10-05-2022 04:01)SUIGYNTOU писал(а):  А нормальные колонки, это какие?

Нормальные напольные уже посоветовали в соседней теме ( Ruark Templar отдавали по хорошей цене в военное время и похоже, что очень быстро их купили, забудьте ) :
https://hi-fi-forum.net/forum/thread-199...pid4397806

Ruark Templar review
by Andrew Smith
Posted on September 3, 2018
Definitely part of the craftsmanship school of British loudspeaker manufacturers, Ruark might also be regarded as one of the pace-setters in the current trend towards compact floor-standing speakers, thanks largely to the redoubtable £1400 Talisman.

This new £850 Templar model follows a very similar design outline, but represents a simplified variation in order to achieve the £550 saving. In place of the T2’s box-section hardwood-veneered 20mm MDF baffle, the Ruark Templar has a conventional box made of 15mm MDF throughout. However, the worthwhile backward slant is retained, enhancing mechanical stability, helping to time-align the drivers and aiding acoustic projection upwards from the lowish source.

One factor that could split the family is the appearance of the front baffle. The other five faces are black textured vinyl, but the baffle is finished in an unspecified real wood on which is printed the pattern of something much fancier. It might be imitation burr walnut, but is much too Formica for my taste. There’s no avoiding this baffle, as the neat and well chamfered grille only covers the top third or less.

Magnet apart, the main driver looks very similar to the Talisman’s, with 120mm paper cone, soft surround and cast frame, securely fixed and rebated in place with brass machine head bolts. The tweeter has a 29mm soft fabric dome. Only the top four fifths of the cabinet loads the main driver, the lower fifth being partitioned off, aiding stiffness, and enabling mass loading to be added. Besides the partition, there’s a lateral brace and several strategically placed strips of wood, plus a good fill of wadding. A complex high grade hardwired crossover links up to the drivers with heavy gauge wire. Reasonable spikes are fitted, but only into sockets inserted in the wooden base at present,

Sound quality

The Ruark Templar generated some mixed reactions in the blind tests, but was quite positively received by the majority. While some found the sound a little dull, others felt this aided the projection of midrange and voice detail in particular, giving an unforced quality that succeeds more through subtlety than punch or drama.

I have to admit I didn’t get on too well with this model personally, either blind or in subsequent sighted work, the latter revealing a rather limited loudness capability too. The sound is well-controlled and impressively vice-free, which can have its advantages when coping with compromised sources (like the SACD player), but I found the lack of excitement rather frustrating.

Conclusion

You can make your own judgements over the aesthetics, but I have to say I found the sound of this speaker too dull and lifeless, and distinctly more so than the Talisman 2. And the fact that this observation correlates closely with the measured balance differences between the two does tend to back up that judgement.


или хотя бы бюджетные Castle Severn, "ниже уже уотерлиния" для кинотеатральных систем.